5/10/2023 0 Comments Autocad text styles chartWe can have drawings with styles Standard, ROMANS, ROMAND, SHX30, and a host of others. We get drawings that have gone through multiple clients and EPCs using a variety standards and adherence to those standards. ![]() Not to mention title block text, or block attributes inside circles/squares. Whoops - now the text across the *entire* drawing has changed, even though their scope of work is in the corner. Being a good company they want consistent drawings so they use automation (or manually) to change the style settings. That new company also uses the name "Standard" for its styles (hey, its a standard, why not.), but they use ROMANS.shx for their font. It may also be sufficient if your company can set the standards for all others who work on those drawings.īut lets say your drawing goes back to the client, and they send it somewhere else to be updated (as-build, new project, what have you). If all of your drawings are internal and don't go anywhere else, "Standard" as a style name can be sufficient. For instance, you can emphasize something in the middle of an Mtext note by just giving a different color to some of the content, without the need for or a different font assignment as you would need within an Arial-styled note. SHX fonts is that you can get different weights of text in the same size of the same Style. But I would suggest you take some drawing with a large quantity of text, and make copies using something like RomanS for everything and using Arial for everything, and compare the time they take to open.Īnother advantage to. However, that experiment was long enough ago that the increased speed of computer processors may make it significantly less noticeable now. ![]() We use the same style for Dimensions as for notes, not because it saves much time in generation but just to match. So we use RomanS for most purposes, RomanD for a few, and things from the Swiss family only for shorter pieces of larger Text such as drawing titles, but never a TrueType font for "body text" such as notes. With a TrueType font than it was with any. What we found was that in a drawing with a lot of textual elements in it, such as a sheet of Wall Sections with lots of notes, the generation time was We experimented with using TrueType fonts for all textual elements some time ago. However, there's something else you may not have considered. Every textual element has a Style assigned to it, and there's no advantage or disadvantage to Standard in comparison to others, that I'm aware of. I don't think there's any advantage one way or another. Some of our different names use the same font, but are different only because some of them are fixed-height and others are not. But you can certainly change the font assigned to the Standard style, so that you can use Standard without sticking with the default TXT font. We leave AutoCAD's default "Standard" style alone and define our own standards with a few different names for different purposes. If there are no problems using standard, why shouldn't I use standard in my multileader styles, and table styles? In our company we currently use Arial as the default font.Īnd to extend this thought a bit more. If there are no problems using standard, why shouldn't I use standard in my multileader styles, and table wrote: ![]() Is there some un-intended autocad behaviour to using standard all the time? (Like using layer 0, and defpoints)Īnd to extend this thought a bit more. What is the benefit of using a different text file over standard?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |